[Free-RTC] suggesting speakers for FOSDEM?

Muhammad Yameen yameen823 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 5 18:55:22 CET 2015


hello boss

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.pro> wrote:

>
> This is good feedback Daniel
>
> Here are some other thoughts I had about possible ways to organize the
> dev-room, based on things I've seen in the past and in other events:
>
> - 50% XMPP and 50% telephony - basically like what we did when we had
> the dev-room for two days
> - each of the admins (Ralph, Saúl, Iain and myself) picks 2 hours worth
> of speakers
> - wait until the deadline and then ask the speakers to rate each other
> - tag each proposal with keywords (e.g. WebRTC, XMPP, SIP) and then make
> sure we pick at least one speaker for each keyword
> - asking the speakers to work in a panel or group discussion as you have
> described
> - asking speakers from related topics to work sequentially but without a
> gap between those talks (e.g. three XMPP speakers for 15 minutes each
> with a very rapid change between each) and then 15 minutes for questions
> to all the speakers in that series
>
> I'm not suggesting any of these ideas is best, it would be really
> interesting to hear ideas from other people who want to attend or speak.
>
>
> On 04/11/15 13:35, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > accommodating all proposals from sip/xmpp/everything-rtc might be
> > difficult -- if not submitted so far, I expect to be plenty before the
> > deadline.
> >
> > In my opinion this is a good occasion to share knowledge across
> > different protocols/projects, so it might worth setting up some panels
> > on common topics of RTC:
> >
> > - security
> > - scalability
> > - continuous integration
> > - etc...
> >
> > We have to keep in mind that the conference is developer oriented, so I
> > am not looking at seeing on how some stuff can be configured for a
> > particular VoIP/XMPP/... project, but more generics like how easy/hard
> > was to implement something, what libraries/projects are friendly to
> > reuse (e.g., for HA).
> >
> > Other topics I would like to see approached:
> >
> > - client and server apps developers discussing what the other side does
> > good or bad
> >
> > - involvement of open source devs in standardization process. Maybe xmpp
> > is way better here, as it started from community towards
> > standardization, but with SIP I noticed that most of us kind of stops as
> > doing a hack in its open source app to fix a real problem, not pursuing
> > further to IETF/ETSI/ITU/etc.
> >
> > These are couple of ideas so far, maybe not all suitable for Fosdem
> > (again, the event targets developer topics), but then this mailing list
> > can be used to discuss further if other people are interested in same
> > topics.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >
> > On 03/11/15 16:43, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> While we've sent out a call for participation and we are hoping to
> >> receive applications from speakers, it is also possible for people to
> >> suggest speakers who we can contact and invite.
> >>
> >> So if there is a particular developer who you would like to see in the
> >> RTC dev-room, feel free to ask them to apply or send me their name and
> >> some details about why you are nominating them and I will try to contact
> >> them.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Free-RTC mailing list
> >> Free-RTC at lists.fsfe.org
> >> https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/free-rtc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Free-RTC mailing list
> Free-RTC at lists.fsfe.org
> https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/free-rtc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/free-rtc/attachments/20151105/fb04eae7/attachment.html>


More information about the Free-RTC mailing list