transparency about the fellowship
Daniel Pocock
daniel at pocock.pro
Mon Jul 9 19:59:57 UTC 2018
On 09/07/18 21:31, Reinhard Müller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Am 2018-07-09 um 20:57 schrieb Daniel Pocock:
>> A single fellow also made a bequest of EUR 150,000 to FSFE and they were
>> not identified publicly.
>
> Correction: We recieved a large sum out of an inheritance where the
> deceased explicitly wished to remain anonymous. We never claimed that
> this person was a Fellow, and to keep anonymity of the person intact, I
> will also not make any statement about whether or not the deceased was a
> Fellow.
>
Would FSFE be willing to allow the elected fellowship representative to
know the facts about this person and see their written intentions?
>> Every corporate donor who contributes over 10%
>> is named publicly. Does anybody feel that the same transparency
>> principle should apply in cases such as bequests?
>
> We clarified this with "Initiative Transparente Zivilgesellschaft" whose
> rules we follow regarding transparency, and they confirmed that it is ok
> to follow the deceased's wish for anonymity.
>
> Personally, I do not see a large risk of the deceased person trying to
> influence FSFE's policy in future.
>
I think it may be useful in such cases for the fact this happened to be
in the list of top donors anyway, but with a statement there saying
"name withheld - bequest" and a brief note about how FSFE acts in such
cases.
>> The dissemination of the fellowship statistics on the team mailing list
>> stopped shortly after the extraordinary general assembly.
>
> Huh? There hasn't been any change in this. The statistics is still sent
> each Sunday on 4:00 by a cron job.
>
> For others reading here: the statistics shows the number of supporters
> by country and the development over the past months and years. It is
> sent to the "core team" mailing list so that people coordinating an
> activity can get feedback about the development of supporter numbers.
>
Last email I saw was on 10 June, if it is a technical issue please let
me know
>> I notice that
>> the fellowship numbers had been increasing last year but in the last few
>> months it has been decreasing. Personally, I suspect that two factors
>> may be responsible:
>>
>> [...]
>
> Maybe it's the discussion currently happening on some public mailing
> lists which create the impression that FSFE is mainly busy with its own
> internals rather than doing actual work. It is unfortunate that such an
> impression comes up, because it does not match reality.
>
Not discussing the issue runs the risk that things continue to slide.
I notice that our sister organization, the FSF, also produces an annual
report[1] with membership and supporter data. They report having 9
board members with voting rights and 2000 volunteers.
Their report includes the amounts paid in some individual salaries and a
much more detailed budget.
The amortization report lists some of the hardware products they have
chosen.
In my role as representative, I'm keen to see a similar amount of detail
made available to FSFE's fellows and I wouldn't be performing my role
properly if I didn't ask questions like that.
Regards,
Daniel
1. https://www.fsf.org/about/financial
More information about the Discussion
mailing list