Another comment of interest. I think Bernhard has a good point.
From Bernhard Reiter, 2009-02-20:
> Am Freitag, 20. Februar 2009 07:54:49 schrieb Stian Rødven Eide:
> > > 2. The reader should be under development (with the latest commit being
> > > within the last 1.5 years)
>
> Note that usually this is a bad criteria, there is really cool software
> without commits in the last 1.5 years. I would make it "maintained" without
> being too specific.