CPU as a service // MINIX in Intel ME

[Adonay Felipe Nogueira]

If I'm not mistaken, this is already there.

They are freedoms, not obligations against the user. They must be
possoble of course, but the user isn't obligated to make use of all of
the freedoms, the same applies to freedom 0, see [1].

[1] <http://dcc.ufmg.br/~lcerf/rms.webm>. This is multi-audio-track
file. First is with speech in English and commentaries unchanged (either
in English or in Brazilian Portuguese); second is with speech translated
to Brazilian Portuguese (it has some minor errors and cuts but it's OK
for the majority of the speech).

2017-11-29T12:21:54+0100 Andrea Trentini wrote:
> (a latere, semi-serious)
>
> May I propose an amendment to the first freedom (as in
> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html)?
>
> "The freedom to run the program as you wish, for any purpose (freedom 0)."
>
> should become
>
> "The freedom to run (or NOT to run) the program as you wish, for any
> purpose (freedom 0)."
>
> Of course it's redundant, but it emphasizes the liberty to opt-out.

-- 
- https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
  gratis).
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre. Por favor, veja formas de se comunicar
  instantaneamente comigo no endereço abaixo.
- Contato: https://libreplanet.org/wiki/User:Adfeno#vCard
- Arquivos comuns aceitos (apenas sem DRM): Corel Draw, Microsoft
  Office, MP3, MP4, WMA, WMV.
- Arquivos comuns aceitos e enviados: CSV, GNU Dia, GNU Emacs Org, GNU
  GIMP, Inkscape SVG, JPG, LibreOffice (padrão ODF), OGG, OPUS, PDF
  (apenas sem DRM), PNG, TXT, WEBM.