paying artists
Alex Hudson
home at alexhudson.com
Fri Feb 15 09:06:20 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 09:38 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Alex Hudson <home at alexhudson.com> writes:
> > In continental Europe, things are different again, since there is a
> > much stronger adherence to moral rights, which have little to do
> > with the economics.
>
> By that account, then, it seems that in the EU also it is not the goal
> of copyright to redistribute money.
Not really:
"If authors or performers are to continue their creative and
artistic work, they have to receive an appropriate reward for
the use of their work, as must producers in order to be able to
finance this work. [..] Adequate legal protection of
intellectual property rights is necessary in order to guarantee
the availability of such a reward and provide the opportunity
for satisfactory returns on this investment." - 2001/29/EC (10)
There are provisions for the protection of author's standing and
reputation (loosely, "moral rights"), but most directives at a European
level are aimed more at ensuring a consistent internal market and
similar compensation for artists across each member state.
For example, 2001/84/EC, "Directive on the resale right for the benefit
of the author of an original work of art", was purely aimed at ensuring
artists get paid the same rate of royalty no matter where their works
are resold.
Cheers,
Alex.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list