Problems with the GPL as I see them
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Thu Sep 28 12:03:14 UTC 2006
But in my reading still requires the distributor to puts generous
constraints on the use of the signing authenticator output if they
retain the right to distribute.
A signature key is not a authorization key. The key is not needed to
use the program.
> 2nd you don't need a *special* password to unpack/read/copy the
> source code. The SSL layer is transparent and accessible to
> anyone.
replace SSL (+HTTP) with S/MIME (+SMTP) and a per-recipient
encryption with a key generated by the distributor, which key
contains copyrighted data and trademarks in the accompanying
signed-key certificate.
You don't need a special password to use/copy/modify/distribute the
program once it is unpacked.
Cheers.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list