licensing question for a C++ template library

jacob at jacob at
Sun Oct 22 20:11:59 UTC 2006

>> What's vital for our lib is to be usable by GPL and LGPL software,   
>> the rest is
>> optional, but still a plus.
> I wouldn't call supporting proprietary software a "plus".
> To me, it isn't.
> So I'd like to convince you to stay with the GPL.

Here, by "the rest", I meant BSD-licensed software and other free  
software. Sorry if that wasn't clear.


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

More information about the Discussion mailing list