BitKeeper license critic
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Thu Mar 7 10:10:59 UTC 2002
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 12:40:28AM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> wrote:
> > [...] http://subversion.tigris.org/ [...]
>
> This seems to be where the smart money is right now, from people I know.
> What features does BitKeeper have that are needed to be added to subversion?
Arch has a quick comparison chart started.
It has always stopped me (personally) from trying Aegis or cook in
the past, that I could never easily find a comparison
what really is different to cvs or make and a real reason to use it.
My emails suggesting to add an overview comparision at a place easy
to find where never satisfactory answered.
(Note: This was _years_ ago.)
Now I personally tend to try SCons over make next time I need this technology.
Bernhard
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20020307/efe2d9bb/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list