OpenOffice.org [was:Re: Why we speak about Free Software]

[Rui Miguel Silva Seabra]

On Thu, 2002-04-25 at 12:11, joack at gmx.net wrote:
> > They should just make StarOffice free and you wouldn't have those
> > problems.
> SUN has just kindly agreed to go in the other direction. StarOffice 
> has now to be paid for (as Version 6). Maybe that gets people 
> noticing - maybe.

On other happy news, GUADEC 3 helped spun new life into the GNOME Office
project, partly because of the dire news of OO and SO.

Hugs, rms

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi
+ So let's do it...?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20020425/5d08dc40/attachment.sig>