License Distribution
Bernhard Reiter
bernhard at intevation.de
Tue Jan 23 10:48:28 UTC 2001
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 07:47:31PM +0000, MJ Ray wrote:
> Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> writes:
>
> > (I don't know why they allow proprietory licenses....., I always
> > thought they did not, but obviously someone should inquire otherwise
> > the brand sourceforge for free software is damaged.)
>
> I suspect that proprietary means that it's their own (YAOSL?) licence,
> not that it's commercial software.
Free Software and commercial does not exclude each other.
You mean that they own the license?
> Perhaps sourceforge is for Open
> Source rather than Free software?
The widely accepted criteria of software being regarded free or open
are (almost) the same. So there is no difference.
There is a difference in the movement.
> > Unfortunalty I have not found an easy method to get the license
> > distribution of the freshmeat database. (I have send them mail
> > and asked for it today.)
>
> I updated my copy of their applist today.
Cool. Thanks.
The votes for free software are:
7889 GPL
589 LGPL
490 BSDtype
435 OpenSource
208 PublicDomain
109 Artistic&GPL
67 MIT
65 Apachestyle
53 MPL
44 QPL
25 unknown
17 EiffelForumFreewareLicense
6 ThePHPLicense
4 IBMPublicLicense
1 X11/System
1 X11/Education
1 NPL
> Apologies for the lack of spaces, but my applist is a cooked copy for
> another project.
No problem.
Thanks.
Bernhard
--
Professional Service around Free Software (intevation.net)
The FreeGIS Project (freegis.org)
Association for a Free Informational Infrastructure (ffii.org)
FSF Europe (fsfeurope.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 248 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20010123/85cdbc45/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list