License Distribution
MJ Ray
markj at cloaked.freeserve.co.uk
Mon Jan 22 19:47:31 UTC 2001
Bernhard Reiter <bernhard at intevation.de> writes:
> (I don't know why they allow proprietory licenses....., I always
> thought they did not, but obviously someone should inquire otherwise
> the brand sourceforge for free software is damaged.)
I suspect that proprietary means that it's their own (YAOSL?) licence,
not that it's commercial software. Perhaps sourceforge is for Open
Source rather than Free software?
> Unfortunalty I have not found an easy method to get the license distribution
> of the freshmeat database. (I have send them mail and asked for it today.)
I updated my copy of their applist today. The votes are:
7889 GPL
594 freelydistributable
589 LGPL
490 BSDtype
459 Freeware
435 OpenSource
303 freetousebutrestricted
299 freefornon-commercialuse
225 Artistic
208 PublicDomain
150 proprietary
126 FreeTrial
109 Artistic&GPL
72 Shareware
67 MIT
65 Apachestyle
53 MPL
44 QPL
33 source-availableproprietary
25 unknown
17 EiffelForumFreewareLicense
6 ThePHPLicense
4 IBMPublicLicense
2 VoxelPublicLicense
2 SunCommunitySourceLicensing
2 FreeWorldLicence
2 AFPL
1 X11/System
1 X11/Education
1 SUNBinaryCodeLicense
1 NPL
Apologies for the lack of spaces, but my applist is a cooked copy for
another project.
--
MJR
More information about the Discussion
mailing list