[Fsfe-ie] Re: Some help with understanding the directive document?
ciaran at fsfe.org
Fri Aug 26 22:45:25 CEST 2005
teresahackett at eircom.net writes:
> The framework decision lies mainly
> with the Council with little role for the parliament.
ok. At a quick read, The Framework Decision (pages 12->15) looks ok anyway.
I guess we just have to watch out for amendments making it dangerous.
> The procedure for the Directive should be the same as usual. Perhaps you
> should check this with a local.
Yes, Codecision Procedure according to:
So it's the same as the swpat directive.
> So we should support the organised crime parts but get rid of commercial
> scale and the TRIPS+ provisions e.g. inciting infringements, etc.
> There's probably not much we can do on the framework decision, but we
> should be able to lobby for the directive. But take advice on this!
Ciarán O'Riordan, | Support FSFE's work against
http://www.compsoc.com/~coriordan/ | software patents by becoming
| a Fellow: http://fsfe.org
More information about the FSFE-IE