[Fsfe-ie] Irish proposal on software patents passed
s_fsfeurope2 at nedprod.com
Wed May 19 00:16:36 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 18 May 2004 at 22:17, Ian Clarke wrote:
> One would hope that such underhanded tactics would increase sympathy
> for our position at the next EP vote, or is such deception commonly
> used to undermine the will of Europe's elected representatives?
> I hope that the next time this hits the EP it can be characterised for
> what it is, a direct challenge to the influence of the Parliament on
> how laws are written in Europe.
The letters I'll be sending to all MEPs will be simple: reinstate all
amendments originally made by Parliament previously. To try for
rejection is hard - 66% of all MEP's need to vote against - and
simply reinstating all amendments is easy for MEPs as they can rely
on the logic that if they voted for it last time it's probably good.
I had expected the council of ministers to do something like this
which is why I stopped campaigning after the first EP vote. However I
was surprised they really went as pro-patent as they did and
furthermore acted so contrarily to the EP's will which surely they
must know will invite a "revenge" response from the EP for second
Ok, who knows what happens if the EP restores all its previous
amendments? Can the commission then simply withdraw the directive
completely or must they accept it? Can they ignore the EP again?
And when is the second reading? I'd like to do two rounds of letters
if possible, I'll have income for the first time in two years come
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: idw's PGP-Frontend 220.127.116.11 / 9-2003 + PGP 8.0.2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the FSFE-IE