[Fsfe-ie] patents letter stuff
seth.johnson at realmeasures.dyndns.org
Sat Jan 31 06:06:54 CET 2004
Point them to the public reaction when they found out about the W3c's plan
to allow patents:
Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm still writing that patents letter, although I've overcommitted
> myself a bit recently so work is slow. I have a draft, but it gets
> rewritten every time I look at it, so it's not yet at a stage where it
> would be useful to post it and ask for comments.
> A request:
> Can people find a few great technologies that *aren't* patented?
> I'm thinking about SMS text messaging? is that patent-free?
> Does anyone know of other technologies that have really taken off?
> so that we can say "look at how progress really happens"
> It has to be stuff that a politician would know about.
> Telecommunications stuff is extra-brill since the big telecoms are
> pushing for patents, so it would be great if we could distinguish
> between what's good for one (foreign) company, and what's good for
> progress (or useful innovation).
> I'll be looking into this myself, but I'm not very technology-aware.
> Aidan Delaney previously mentioned Voice Over IP as an example.
> Lasty (rushed mail), the FTC's patents report is brilliant, the software
> patents section starts on p153 (printed page 44) and is 13 pages long.
> The whole doc is 315 pages, but just reading the software section is
> very encouraging.
> Ian provided a link to the FTC report in a recent post.
> Stallman is quoted 16 times in the report!
> Ciaran O'Riordan - http://www.compsoc.com/~coriordan/
> fsfe-ie at fsfeurope.org mailing list
> List information: http://mail.fsfeurope.org/pipermail/fsfe-ie
> Public archive: https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-ie
DRM is Theft! We are the Stakeholders!
New Yorkers for Fair Use
[CC] Counter-copyright: http://realmeasures.dyndns.org/cc
I reserve no rights restricting copying, modification or distribution of
this incidentally recorded communication. Original authorship should be
attributed reasonably, but only so far as such an expectation might hold for
usual practice in ordinary social discourse to which one holds no claim of
More information about the FSFE-IE