Comment on Bill Gates' statement to free software
jacob.dawid at cybercatalyst.net
Fr Jul 26 10:40:50 UTC 2013
I found it important to comment on Bill Gates's statement to free
software. Here is the entire blogpost as a copy. If you like it, you are
free to share it.
Thank God for commercial software. It actually funds salaries, gives
people jobs. And thank God for free software, it lets people get things
out there, you can play around, build on. The two work very well in an
- Bill Gates
What a pile of fraudulent praise.
The problem here is that Mr. Gates is making a difference between
commercial and free software, as if the advantages of free software
could be justified on an economic scale. In fact, most free software is
available gratis today, which is the consequence of a market where the
duplication cost (copying) is almost zero*.
So, does Mr. Gates conciously lie to you? Kind of, because as soon as
you read between the lines he is making a third, hidden statement
through his opposition - a clever stroke to say something while you're
not actually saying it. Each of his statements is absolutely valid:
Commercial software funds salaries and gives people jobs. Meanwhile, it
is also true that free software lets people play around and build on.
There are two more truths: There is also a yet substantial and growing
amount of free software developed and used in commercial fields, which
also funds salaries and gives jobs. Plus, people can also play around
and build on proprietary software, which is difficult but not impossible
for software for which the developers did not release the source code,
but more realistically in cases where developers released their source
code under a non-free license. So while you technically can play around
and build on that kind of software, you are committing illegal action
(as regarded by law) as soon as you start to enhance or run it as you
like - or whatever silly restriction there may be.
Hence, Mr. Gates' statement is extremely harmful to free software, not
only because he is omitting the nasty truth, but at the same time he is
implicitly giving people the false impression that commercial success is
unconditionally bound to be a feature to proprietary software.
* Well, it is not exactly zero. If you buy free software on CD, making
a copy requires you to pay the physical medium and the cost of actually
making a copy. If you get your copy over the internet, you have to pay
for an internet connection and eventually someone has to pay for the
server, both the server itself and the running expenses of that server."
"Wer für alles offen ist, kann nicht ganz dicht sein."
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste FSFE-de