US cryptocurrency legislation (Re: FSFE and the war in Europe)
Paul Boddie
paul at boddie.org.uk
Fri Mar 18 11:41:44 UTC 2022
On Friday, 18 March 2022 10:18:06 CET fsfe at centromere.net wrote:
> Perhaps a statement about this pending legislation would be relevant and on
> topic for FSFE:
>
> https://www.coincenter.org/new-crypto-sanctions-bill-targets-publishing-code
> -facilitating-transactions/
A statement about US legislation targeting cryptocurrency exchanges that
allegedly facilitate sanctions evasion? I might be upset about any supposed
threat to Free Software developers who inadvertently find their code being
used to facilitate cryptocurrency transactions, but then the people running
that Web site are...
"...the leading non-profit research and advocacy center focused on the public
policy issues facing cryptocurrency and decentralized computing technologies
like Bitcoin and Ethereum."
Based in Washington DC, no less, meaning that they are full-on lobbyists for
that industry. And I find it hard to sympathise with that industry,
personally. Claims that "crypto" would be useless for criminal transactions
don't exactly line up with the experience of anyone receiving the average
scam/spam mail trying to extort money out of them.
And the idea that criminals wouldn't use Bitcoin - for instance - because "all
the money can be traced" deliberately neglect that just because there's a
wallet doesn't mean everybody knows whose wallet it is. (It reminds me of the
debate about what kind of identity guarantees OpenID could give, but maybe
that isn't a perfect analogy.)
Free Software developers definitely need protection from bad law, but the
"crypto" business does not deserve our sympathy. It promotes wasteful and
ruinous use of technology (good luck getting a graphics card) and needless
energy consumption, driving climate change to stimulate asset price bubbles.
Useful idiots for this industry write outrageously disingenous articles like
this:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/feb/09/can-bitcoin-be-sustainable-inside-the-norwegian-mine-that-also-dries-wood
And it also promotes pervasive levels of fraudulent activity that burdens our
infrastructure and targets the vulnerable. Here is an article just from
today's news:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/mar/18/accc-takes-meta-to-court-over-facebook-scam-ads-depicting-australian-identities
The confluence of Facebook and "crypto": two awful tastes that couldn't
possibly be any worse until they are brought together. Interestingly, this
legislation was mentioned yesterday on Electoral Vote:
https://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2022/Senate/Maps/Mar17.html#item-5
In case you might be wondering, the author there is Andrew Tanenbaum whose
reputation in computer science is well established. And he isn't wrong about
how people have been rather too easily convinced that "crypto" offers a
solution to problems that could otherwise be easily fixed if people genuinely
cared about things like poverty and opportunity.
Paul
More information about the Discussion
mailing list