FSFE-defined coding standards?

[kreyren at rixotstudio.cz]

On 2/10/21 1:10 PM, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> everybody is
> already doing that

I don't believe that more standards are a bad thing.

 > Some coding standard make no sense, some are ugly, some are good; you 
only need to choose yours -- or be forced by your employer.

Agree that some or even majority of them doesn't make any sense and are 
terrible in general thus this proposal to develop them as a set of 
multiple standards instead of one huge standard to allow developers to 
cherry-pick the one they want to follow and discuss them for their projects.

-- 
- Krey

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0x31AE4020956E0A9A.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20210210/e4233724/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 855 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20210210/e4233724/attachment.sig>