FSFE-defined coding standards?

Eike Rathke erack at fsfe.org
Wed Feb 10 11:39:42 UTC 2021

Hi kreyren,

On Wednesday, 2021-02-10 08:46:15 +0000, kreyren at rixotstudio.cz wrote:

> Justify bad code and elaborate on bad mail user agents.

No. But if these produce text I can't read and cripple "source code" to
be discussed there's no incentive to even follow a discussion.


OpenPGP/GnuPG encrypted mail preferred in all private communication.
GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Use LibreOffice! https://www.libreoffice.org/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20210210/5d3f5572/attachment.sig>

More information about the Discussion mailing list