the questions you really want FSFE to answer
Carmen Bianca Bakker
carmenbianca at fsfe.org
Thu Jun 14 22:13:17 UTC 2018
On ĵaŭ, 2018-06-14 at 22:37 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > This statement could create the impression that Daniel Pocock was the
> > one vote against the simplification of the membership procedure.
> > However, this is not the case. Daniel Pocock did not participate in this
> > vote, nor did he participate in the General Assembly altogether (neither
> > personally nor by delegation).
> Some people may have chosen not to attend the meeting so that it
> wouldn't achieve quorum.
That sounds unusually anti-democratic. A staunch democrat votes.
> In my case, I actually went out to Albania and Kosovo for free software
> events while other FSFE GA members and staff were meeting in Berlin
> to remove my position.
This sounds more than a little disingenuous. It sounds like you are
implying that the GA scarcely go to free software events and/or only
had a meeting to vote on a single matter. Both couldn't be further
from the truth.
I am certain that there is a better platform or way to address these
disagreements than what looks like airing dirty laundry in public,
though. The CoC mandates that criticism be constructive, and claims
> As the last man standing for democracy in FSFE
...don't look the part.
I assume you have good intentions, Daniel, and love free software every
bit as much as the rest of us, so I want to ask you if your issues can
be addressed with the same assumption of good intentions.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Discussion