negative campaigning?
Federico Bruni
fede at inventati.org
Wed Jul 26 22:36:22 UTC 2017
Il giorno mer 26 lug 2017 alle 13:28, Ioli Papadopoulou
<i.papadopoulou at sophimail.com> ha scritto:
> Excellent topic; thank you for bringing it up.
>
>
> Avoiding negative language will help us become BETTER ambassadors of
> FOSS. Negative language creates negative feelings about us!
>
> We can simply take lessons from other industries facing the same
> problem. For example, let's see the language of small "natural
> cosmetics" when they try to fight against "synthetic" dominant
> competitors. They keep on pointing out what they do better, to the
> Customers benefit: "no parabens, no additives, no chemicals, only
> natural ingredients" etc. They do not name or imply their competitor.
> They just repeat what is "better for you" and "does not harm you".
>
>
> So, to come back to software: we could use strong laconic statements,
> such as: "Debian sends no telemetry reports". It is true, everybody
> understands it and it is not aggressive.
>
Hi Ioli
It looks like your opinion is the opposite of Daniel's opinion.
He's saying that we, as free software activists, should do _more_
negative campaigning. Why? Because a positive attitude, like caring for
the privacy of the users, may be perceived as more valuable if people
knew that proprietary software/services behave very bad in this regard.
I agree with Daniel and I don't think that negative campaigning means
negative language.
The american FSF has done lot of negative campaigning, in a polite and
positive way (as when you provide alternatives).
>
> Persistence and patience are necessary, too. People need time to
> contemplate and then change; they cannot change overnight.
>
> Is it possible to make a "collection" of nice, positive statements
> about FOSS and then distribute them to all members? I thing that some
> of us, including me, would need some help, in "expressing in a
> positive way"!
>
Something like this? :-)
https://fsfe.org/campaigns/ilovefs/whylovefs/whylovefs.en.html
More information about the Discussion
mailing list