Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?
mray
mail at mray.de
Tue Jul 25 20:02:41 UTC 2017
On 25.07.2017 21:44, mray wrote:
> Reaching people isn't the end goal. Just like market share isn't.
> We are about freedom. What if I asked FSFE to tweet its take on using
> twitter? Wouldn' the honest tweet be:
>
> "You should not use twitter
> as it is a walled garden and
> proprietary software."
>
> Maybe that tweet should never reach 1000 people.
> Let alone more.
>
>
Turns out I don't have to wait for this as the FSFE website says:
"Some services may be Free Software unfriendly and harm your privacy."
I guess the unfriendly harming refers to twitter and facebook, less to
GNUsocial and Diaspora. My impression was there was **no doubt** about
harm being done. Aren't we framing it a bit opportunistic here?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20170725/d9535b3b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list