Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?

[Ksamak]

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 09:14:17AM +0200, mray wrote:
> 
> 
> On 21.06.2017 12:45, mray wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > I think treating them as second class could be OK:
> > 
> > 1. post on a free software platform
> > 2. don't reply on twitter or facebook, just link to the original
> > 
> > 
> > -Robert
> > 
> 
> Following this whole thread I think I changed my mind:
> We can't give in to the network effect and ask people to reject it.
> Reaching people at the cost of being inauthentic defeats the purpuse to
> begin with.
> 
> I mean what is an organization like FSFE if it can't even serve as an
> example?
> 

No real point here, juste adding a support increment. ++ to mray.

-- 
Ksamak
Silicon based lifeform
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20170725/08b05a81/attachment.sig>