Is it acceptable to use proprietary software (platforms) to promote software freedom?
mray
mail at mray.de
Tue Jul 25 07:14:17 UTC 2017
On 21.06.2017 12:45, mray wrote:
>
>
> I think treating them as second class could be OK:
>
> 1. post on a free software platform
> 2. don't reply on twitter or facebook, just link to the original
>
>
> -Robert
>
Following this whole thread I think I changed my mind:
We can't give in to the network effect and ask people to reject it.
Reaching people at the cost of being inauthentic defeats the purpuse to
begin with.
I mean what is an organization like FSFE if it can't even serve as an
example?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20170725/ad45f5eb/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list