A dual license system for code libraries?
agner at agner.org
Sun Feb 26 16:40:29 UTC 2017
On 26-02-2017 10:50, Carsten Agger wrote:
> But maybe Agner might consider using the Mozilla Public License 2.0?
> It differs from the GPL and LGPL in that
> So changes to Agner's library would remain free software, but people
> can use it to build proprietary application which they supply in other
This is the best proposal so far. But it still nags me that this gives
proprietary software vendors a free lunch when they are actually quite
willing to pay, while the open source movement has so many financing
problems. Here are some low-hanging fruits that we are not picking
because we cannot agree how to organize it.
Florian Snow wrote:
> What you might
> want to consider is setting up a CLA that gives you the right to sell
> exceptions as long as all the money from those sales goes to some
> defined Free Software organization. That way, you don't need to set up
> your own organization, contributors have a guarantee that you won't do
> random other stuff with their contributions and if you do, you lose
> their contributions
This would in reality be a one man organization doing all the
administration work, and everybody would have to trust me. And what
would happen if I die or become unable to continue? It would also get me
into tax problems.
More information about the Discussion