"Joining" vs "becoming a supporter"
Daniel Pocock
daniel at pocock.pro
Fri Dec 1 10:32:40 UTC 2017
On 01/12/17 10:28, Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote:
> (Re-sending this e-mail because I wrongly addressed the first)
>
> Op 30-11-17 om 16:26 schreef Gergely Székely:
>> I think it was not a good idea at all to change the "Join the ..." to
>> "Become a supporter".
>>
>> My point is that "being a member" of something (even if just an
>> associate one) suggests a much stronger bound than being just a
>> "supporter". So I think using phrases as "Join the FSFE", "become a(n
>> associate) member" etc is way more compelling for most of the people.
>
> I agree partially. There is a small problem, however: Previously, it
> was unclear that one could "join" the FSFE without making financial
> contributions. Upon clicking the "join" button, you were prompted to
> make a donation, and this was the only way into the fellowship.
>
> And upon joining the FSFE (i.e., becoming a fellow), you would not have
> equal status to all other FSFE members. Staffers and members of the GA
> would have a say in the FSFE's goings-on, whereas fellows didn't, not
> really. Thus "joining" the FSFE was kind of false advertising.
>
It is even more than that: because the "Join" click was immediately
followed by a request for a recurring payment, people would be very
likely to feel the recurring payment is like a membership fee and gives
them a right to vote.
> Thus the logical solutions were twofold:
>
> 1. Allow people to become fellows without making financial
> contributions, and grant fellows voting rights.
>
> 2. Change the wording to better reflect reality.
>
> Understandably, option 1 isn't very appealing.
>
> However, I would be in _full_ support of reinstating the usage of
> "fellow" for volunteers who contribute time and effort. But then, maybe
> "volunteer" also cuts it?
>
>> I really miss this inviting spirit from fsfe.org.
>> (Also, why is no similar banner on fsfe.org in the last two months of
>> every year?)
>
> If you can contribute such a banner, we would be extremely happy to add
> it. Unfortunately it's outside of my abilities. I'm not a web
> developer.
>
>> I think recruiting members and encouraging people to donate is
>> important. So it worth making extra efforts to doing it right.
>
> I agree
>
Another idea that was raised: keep the "Join" buttons and the "Join"
page, but make it very clear on the page what people can do, e.g. give
them boxes they can tick:
[ ] I want to become a financial supporter but not voting member
[ ] I want to volunteer
[ ] I want to apply for a job or internship
[ ] I want to attend meetings in my town
[ ] I want to become a voting member
Regards,
Daniel
More information about the Discussion
mailing list