Introducing our new blog team

[Johannes Zarl-Zierl]

On Thursday 19 May 2016 10:18:37 Albert Dengg wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:55:12PM +0200, Johannes Zarl-Zierl wrote:
> > 3. The server admins should communicate (and schedule) changes in advance
> > so that service-admins are aware
> 
> i think that is not realistic in all circumstances.
> 
> for any real changes, yes of course we will plan in advance (e.g.
> distribution release update, ...)
> 
> however, if there is a mayor security update, the lead time will
> most likely be quite a bit shorter, depending on the servirity (cases like
> hartbleed come to mind).

You're right - security updates and general emergencies usually come 
unannounced and can't be postponed.
In my defense, I *did* think about that. I just forgot to mention it 
explicitly ;-)

Cheers,
  Johannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20160519/82f0765a/attachment.sig>