Uncorrectable freedom and security issues on x86 platforms
Paul Boddie
paul at boddie.org.uk
Sat Apr 23 14:07:33 UTC 2016
On Saturday 23. April 2016 10.34.10 Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> There are also various other ways to approach this, for example, I
> started a discussion about ARM-based NAS devices on the debian-arm
> list[1]. This is one market where the hardware is readily available
> and the fact it is low power is considered a virtue by most purchasers.
Indeed. Since I use a desktop machine and don't care about the high levels of
integration that plague laptops, and since my desktop machine is over ten
years old, I intend to get a low-power system to replace my current one at
some point. My needs are modest, but people are increasingly reacting to the
supposed "need" to have obscene amounts of RAM and CPU power just to do basic
computing tasks, albeit in a world where every Web page wants to run scripts
from a hundred sites, show ten videos or animations, and lay itself out over
and over again.
> The ASUS C201 appears very weak in the specs. Some things that bother
> me are the screen resolution (only 768 pixels high) and it is USB 2
> only. I don't like the Chrome logo on it either (or is that a sticker
> that comes off?). Are there slightly stronger alternatives?
I can't answer shopping questions like this, but I've been interested in
initiatives like EOMA-68 where thought has been directed towards making open
hardware for such products. EOMA-68 is arguably progressing at an
excruciatingly slow pace, which is understandable given the constraints
involved, but certain vendors do appear to have seen an opportunity for
collaboration with such initiatives.
> Another strategic topic on this theme: people won't necessarily see
> this thread and throw away all their x86 equipment the same day.
> However, how can these ideas be introduced to people at the times when
> they are making purchasing decisions?
I think the usual themes of sustainability and privacy are pretty useful here.
It doesn't hurt that the cost of the new wave of lower-performance devices
makes them easier to consider.
> 1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/2016/04/msg00051.html
I know this is tangential, but I guess what you discuss in that thread might
have some overlap with what the FreedomBox people have been trying to do. The
task of making a non-interactive install image is familiar to me because I
myself pursued the multistrap route to get Debian working on my Ben NanoNote.
Paul
More information about the Discussion
mailing list