The argument against copyleft, or for BSD
Matthias Kirschner
mk at fsfe.org
Tue Jul 21 12:48:58 UTC 2015
* Darryl Plank <darryl at darrylplank.com> [2015-07-13 00:39:24 +0200]:
> To my knowledge, the FSF has only ever stated three reasons why copyleft
> might not be desirable:
>
> 1) For very short programs, where a simpler and much shorter license might
> be more appropriate from a practical point of view. The FSF web site gives a
> very short and simple license for such purposes.
>
> 2) When extending free software that already exists, to avoid using a license
> different from that used by the original developers.
>
> 3) As a more or less short term tactic, as a way of making free software more
> well known and better appreciated when it was not. For such cases, the LGPL
> was developed.
I would add
4) If you want to push a standard (e.g. with Ogg Vorbis).
Regards,
Matthias
--
Matthias Kirschner - Vice President FSFE
Schönhauser Allee 6/7, 10119 Berlin, Germany - t +49-30-27595290
Weblog (blogs.fsfe.org/mk) - Contact (fsfe.org/about/kirschner)
Receive monthly Free Software news (fsfe.org/news/newsletter.html)
Your donation enables our work (fsfe.org/donate)
More information about the Discussion
mailing list