FSFE Newsletter - February 2014
Hugo Roy
hugo at fsfe.org
Mon Feb 10 23:11:14 UTC 2014
+ 2014-02-11 Tue 00:05, Hugo Roy <hugo at fsfe.org>:
> > > I think it's fair to assume that contributing to proprietary
> > > software (and *not* to free software) is not valuable to software
> > > freedom.
> >
> > Well, that stands to question here. Qt is arguably both proprietary *and* free
> > software. Your sentence is certainly true for the general case, but Qt is a
> > corner case. Does the (additional) contribution to proprietary software
> > *weaken* the value of the contribution to the free software?
>
> My personal opinion here is that a business model built around
> making money with proprietary software, and contributing to that
> business model, is not really valuable to software freedom indeed.
Just to avoid confusion, I'm speaking generally here. I do not
care about the particular Qt situation and I'm not making any
judgment on that case.
--
Hugo Roy, Free Software Foundation Europe, <www.fsfe.org>
Deputy Coordinator, FSFE Legal Team, <www.fsfe.org/legal>
Coordinator, FSFE French Team, <www.fsfe.org/fr>
Support Free Software, sign up! <https://fsfe.org/support>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20140211/33a2654f/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list