freebsd-listen at fabiankeil.de
Sat Jun 29 10:49:54 UTC 2013
Michael Kesper <mkesper at schokokeks.org> wrote:
> Am 2013-06-28 13:10, schrieb Fabian Keil:
> >> And the last question: if all above is true, do we want to tell this
> >> to the public? Does it help? Or would we be seen as being completely
> >> paranoid.
> > I think at first the FSFE should make sure that its own website
> > fixing or ditching EtherPad whose developers apparently don't care
> > about accessibility.
> You're mixing up things:
> The FSFE website per se shouldn't require JS at all.
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be mixing up.
Are you saying EtherPad isn't part of the FSFE website?
> Tools like etherpad are really useful and I don't think they can be
> implemented without a certain amount of JS at the moment.
Allowing users to read and modify a text with a browser isn't rocket
> That etherpad isn't accessible is a shame, but I think it's not a
> restriction of JS per se.
has to be exactly the same, but apparently recent EtherPad versions
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Discussion