A pan-European DFD activity proposal

[Jelle Hermsen]

Hi,
I read it and like it. The goals and objectives are easy to grasp and described well.

Regarding the license at the bottom I would suggest replacing "laxer" with "more permissive". I think that's the common way to describe a more liberal license.

And personally I would like to see the removal of the following paragraph, although I do understand why it's there:
"The entries need not agree with all the positions of the FSFE; however, as we have our own agenda, your entry should be favourable to Free Software and Open Standards."

I would really like to read entries that are not favorable to FS and Open Standards. It could be an opportunity to learn from and I think it's always interesting to avoid group think now and then, just to keep your thoughts fresh and your reasoning sound.

Cheers,
Jelle

 
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:30:24 +0100, discussion-bounces at fsfeurope.org wrote:
> Our announcement draft
> <http://etherpad.fsfe.org/ep/pad/view/pg04Sk1jUa/lbwQlO8ja1> is nearly
> finalized. It is still waiting for the information on prizes and jury.
> All sort of comments would be welcome.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Heiki "Repentinus" Ojasild
> <repentinus at fsfe.org>
> <https://wiki.fsfe.org/Fellows/repentinus>
> <http://blogs.fsfe.org/repentinus/>
> _______________________________________________
> Discussion mailing list
> Discussion at fsfeurope.org
> https://mail.fsfeurope.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion