Commercial Software (was: Re: Nokia spreading FUD?)

Alex Hudson home at
Tue Mar 15 14:04:51 UTC 2011


On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 09:36 -0400, simo wrote:
> Given RHEL is offered only after
> payment, would you say it is not commercial ? Or do you claim it is not
> Free Software ?

Given I have already stated my opinion on both those questions, twice
now, I can only conclude that you haven't actually read my contributions
to this thread.

It doesn't seem worthwhile to discuss this, because you a) don't know my
definition [because you didn't read it], and b) are asking me to defend
points of view I don't hold [hence the false dichotomy above].

Again, for the record; Yes, I do say RHEL is commercial. No, I do not
claim it is not free software.



This message was scanned by Better Hosted and is believed to be clean.

More information about the Discussion mailing list