Explaining Open Standards email attachements
Sam Liddicott
sam at liddicott.com
Tue Apr 6 16:04:02 UTC 2010
Yes, but docx is not widespread either.
And for that matter, neither is ODT, or you wouldn't write your document.
I think we understand eachother and are now mostly discusing the meaning of words.
I'm glad you wrote your document and I think it was a good idea to invite feedback.
Best regards,
Sam
-----Original Message-----
From: Hugo Roy <hugo at fsfe.org>
Sent: 06 April 2010 14:05
To: discussion at fsfeurope.org
Subject: Re: Explaining Open Standards email attachements
Le mardi 06 avril 2010 à 13:20 +0100, David Gerard a écrit :
> Indeed. However, as far as the users are concerned, they're
> interoperability.
Again, try to send a 2007 .doc document to a Mac Office - or to a
previous Office version. Try to do the same with a .doc from 2003 to a
1999 version and the other way around.
It doesn't work, it's not in Microsoft's interest to make it work
because they want everyone to upgrade to the last Office.
That's *not* interoperability.
Best,
--
Hugo Roy im: hugo at jabber.fsfe.org
French Coordinator http://www.fsfe.org/about/roy
Free Software Foundation Europe works to create general understanding
and support for software freedom in politics, law and society-at-large.
For more information, see http://www.fsfe.org
More information about the Discussion
mailing list