Effects of “distribution” license terms for web applications (was: ExtJS licencing)
bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Thu Nov 19 22:24:09 UTC 2009
Florian Weimer <fw at deneb.enyo.de> writes:
> It's an interesting problem. In order to make ExtJS part of a web
> application, you have to distribute it. The web application needs to
> comply with the terms of the GPLv3 because it is combined with a work
> under the GPLv3, to create a larger program (by virtue of hyperlinks,
> they are also not separate). However, the whole web application is not
> distributed, only part of it, so it's rather unclear what the GPLv3
> means in this context.
Hence the perceived need for the AGPL, I suppose.
\ “Value your freedom or you will lose it, teaches history. |
`\ “Don't bother us with politics,” respond those who don't want |
_o__) to learn.” —Richard Stallman, 2002 |
More information about the Discussion