Similar discussion list but not only for Europe?

[Sam Liddicott]

* list wrote, On 09/03/09 11:14:
> Am Montag, dem 09. M�r 2009 schrieb Alfred M. Szmidt:
>
>   
>>    > > You might also want to contact the OSI about this.
>>    >
>>    > As far as I understand, OSI is more oriented to less-restrictive
>>    > open source licenses, right?
>>
>>    No, by definition OSI is interested in all Free Software licenses
>>    (which they call "open source") - this includes the licenses with
>>    strong freedom protection like GNU GPLv3.
>>
>> They are also interested in non-free licenses as well, e.g. the NASA
>> public license.
>>     
>
> Stop spreading FUD!
> It is true that this license was accepted by the OSI but rejectet by the FSF.
> But it just was a rather minor problem why it was rejected by the FSF.
>   
I'm puzzled - you say it is FUD; but then you seem to agree with him.

How is it FUD?

Sam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20090309/092f1733/attachment.html>