FDL requirements for original author

David Gerard dgerard at gmail.com
Fri Feb 8 10:33:22 UTC 2008

On 08/02/2008, hwe <hwe at fsfe.org> wrote:

> One position is "if it's not ultimately free, dismiss it." (And some
> count FDL as *non*free.)  I rather support "make it as free as
> possible.  Then keep improving."

GFDL is free by all measures if you don't use invariant sections and
so forth, isn't it? Does anyone dispute that? (I know Debian wouldn't
accept it with invariant sections.)

- d.

More information about the Discussion mailing list