[eigen] Re: LGPLv3 for a C++ Pure Template Library ?

Thu Feb 7 11:55:11 UTC 2008

On Thursday 07 February 2008 11:45:30 Shane Martin Coughlan wrote:
> I have passed your question on to Brett Smith at the FSF licensing lab.

Many thanks!

>    If you no longer need our assistance please let me know.

Well, since I am no lawyer, I am always happy to receive informed advice.

My understanding was that the LGPL3 does indeed cover the case of C++ template 
libraries -- namely in its Section 3, "Object Code Incorporating Material 
from Library Header Files".

I am still interested in a confirmation/infirmation that I got that right.

Cheers,

Benoit
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20080207/ad1c80b8/attachment.sig>