Copyright and jurisdictions (was: GPL License with clause for Web use?)
Ben Finney
ben at benfinney.id.au
Wed Nov 21 22:03:04 UTC 2007
On 21-Nov-2007, simo wrote:
> Remember that only the author can ever sue someone
Perhaps you've missed some of the more nasty developments in copyright
around the world in recent years.
In several jurisdictions (e.g. the USA and many countries that it has
negotiated with for "compatible laws"), copyright infringement is now
a criminal offense: anyone can request that the state prosecute. The
copyright holder never needs to be involved in the case.
> so to get a "Public Domain" at all effects you just need to release
> code without any authorship but with explicit consent to use for any
> purpose, and keep record privately of the fact you own that code.
In jurisdictions that don't have such a concept of Public Domain (e.g.
the UK, I believe), works cannot be released from copyright before
they expire.
Releasing a work "without any authorship" in such a jurisdiction
merely means that the copyright holder still exists but isn't
identified on the work, leaving the recipients with a task of tracking
them down that may be nigh-impossible; which they may need to do if
the license terms are poorly written.
These are not academic issues; they happen with depressing frequency.
> You must live in a different world then the real world ... for a
> license, it does not matter what the laws *should* say, it matters
> what the *current* legal environment is, and what are the *current*
> threats.
Indeed. Perhaps you'll bear that in mind when exhorting people on the
ease of avoiding copyright hassles around the world.
--
\ Rommel: "Don't move, or I'll turn the key on this can of Spam!" |
`\ -- The Goon Show, _Rommel's Treasure_ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fsfe.org/pipermail/discussion/attachments/20071122/7e91a161/attachment.sig>
More information about the Discussion
mailing list