GPLv3 discussion draft 3 is out

[Guido Serra]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> If you distribute a GPL-derived work to one of your clients, you are
> obliged to give the sources to them, and only to them. No one else is
> entitled to a copy of the sources, if they did not get the binaries.
>
> Of course, your client is then free to give binaries *and* sources to
> whomever they please, subject to the same requirement.
>
> Whether changing configuration files, instead of sources,  
> constitutes a
> derived work is a murkier matter, with no general answers.

he he, you centered the question... that's my problem

anyway i have no problem at all, when integrating everything, if i  
find a bug, to correct it, contact the project maintainer, and  
distribute the source to my customers

the problem is just on "configuration" and "bundling" scripts,
that's my "asset" ... i get payed for

- --
Guido Serra aka Zeph
http://guidoserra.it
+39 348 4313 992

sistemista e sviluppatore


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGC6yfEDyqaTiRzQsRAsrLAJ4/M1N+OtlNEnpe6wUxiGSOBw8dYACcD1Ls
UthsDNCyLJF0KgkWNWVANXY=
=3APK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----