Web services and free software
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Sun Jul 22 16:45:34 UTC 2007
> While the GPL (any version) is not a trivial license, any hacker
> who is capable of writting a non-trivial program should be able
> to grasp it in an hour.
Perhaps "should", but they don't.
Probobly for the same reason they don't write well written
programs... ;-)
> Still, it is a easy license compared to most other licenses, and
> the general ideas are easily grasped by the four freedoms of free
> software.
Compared to most other licences? I'm not sure about that. It's more
complex than most BSD-like and Apache-style licences, which are a
significant proportion of "other".
I suppose that is what I get for being vauge, by most other licenses,
I was refering to non-free software licenses.
> Not everyone agrees that the right to see software source on
> someone else's machine you're using is a free software right;
> I'm not particularly sure I do.
>
> I think that this is no different than a machine that I own that
> prohibits me from upgrading it.
Whereas I think it's no different to using a shell on a shared
server.
Well, then I can only assume that you think what Tivio did is ok?
Since that is one way to look at it, a hardware with a shell that the
company is providing access to.
> That's a shame if it's not, they did build in a clause to make it
> compatible:
>
> "You may also choose to redistribute modified versions of
> this program under any version of the Free Software
> Foundation's GNU General Public License version 3 or
> higher, so long as that version of the GNU GPL includes
> terms and conditions substantially equivalent to those of
> this license."
Scratch what I wrote after this, I thought this was from the GPLv3...
More information about the Discussion
mailing list