spam (was: Re: pric 31-Jan-2007)
Matthias Kirschner
mk at fsfe.org
Fri Feb 2 21:44:54 UTC 2007
* Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au> [2007-02-01 09:52:27 +1100]:
> On 31-Jan-2007, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
> > Does anyone know if it makes sense if I add
> >
> > aso10.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (it was always this) to mailman's privacy
> > options:
>
> That's a treadmill that only ever gets faster. It would block that one
> host, but it would mean you need to maintain that field in Mailman
> from now on.
>
> I think that rejecting messages suspected as spam is better done by
> the receiving MTA, not later. That way, you've got the calling party
> on the line (so to speak) and you don't need to make a "generate a new
> message or drop this one on the floor" decision, you just reject it to
> the SMTP client.
Ok, than I will not do this.
Thank you,
Matze
--
Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom! (http://www.fsfe.org)
More information about the Discussion
mailing list