Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
simo
simo.sorce at xsec.it
Tue Sep 26 23:22:16 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 11:36 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> The GPLv3 process is not as open as it should be. Some useful things
> are only in formats like PDF, rather than plain text or html, there are
> browser and email client requirements to meet before participating in
> the comment system (even for reading) and the form of comments is
> limited to ones linked to short sections of the draft. I will retry the
> email interface soon because I have changed my mail client, but the
> instructions http://gplv3.fsf.org/comments/email.html make it pretty
> clear that I am a third-class participant, required to ensure things
> which I have no way of ensuring, so I offer the above concerns in this
> public forum, in case anyone else will ask them first.
>
> The current GPLv3 comment system should be junked before the end of the
> process and replaced with a more common email+web-forum-based moderated
> consultation which is open to all hackers with the most basic software.
Hey you know what? This commenting system actually requires a computer
and a network connection!!!! Oh my God! It requires all that!
I pretend a snail mail based system because _I_ don't want to use
computers or networks as they are evil ...
</sorry but couldn't resist>
Simo.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list