Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Tue Sep 26 17:23:24 UTC 2006
> I do not know if MJ is honest or not since I have never meet him,
> I do know that he spreads much FUD about the GPL, GFDL, GPLv3
> commenting process, etc here. [...]
You know no such thing. I ask that you cease and desist from
posting this type of personal attack on this list.
Since I have not posted any kind of personal attack towards you here,
there is nothing to "cease and desist". You might want to think for a
couple of seconds before you posting an accusation like this, the same
applies to me though.
I believe the FSF should not promote non-free-software licences
like FDL, but I accept we will never all agree about that - it's a
belief, not FUD.
This is clearly FUD, the GFDL is not a non-free software license, it
is not even a software license. It is a free documentation license.
The FSF has never promoted a non-free software license, and will
(hopefully!) never do such a thing, implying that they do is spreading
FUD. If you look at the four freedoms of software, they speak about
"program", a manual is clearly not a program by any long shot.
The GPLv3 comment system is not anybrowser-accessible and that's
not FUD either - it says as much on the site.
Claiming that it is in your opinion unusable because it requires a
specific set of tools to be used is on the other hand FUD. There is
nothing wrong with requiring a set of tools to use something.
Finally, I have never spread FUD about the GPL. Much of my work is
under GPL - I'd not spread FUD about a licence I use a lot.
I stand corrected on that point, thank you.
Cheers.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list