Kernel developers' position on GPLv3
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Fri Sep 22 18:52:55 UTC 2006
Thanks for CCing the reply to discussion@, didn't notice that you
forgot to CC to.
> However, if the Linux Kernel could use the GPLv3 would be
> better than, as they say, a "Balkanisation of the entire [snip]
> Universe upon which we rely".
>
> Those who wish to do evil, or allow evil, will always think
> lesser about our goals.
>
> Or do you think that if the Linux Kernel 'll stay with GPLv2
> this won't be a problem ???
>
> Unless you get agreement from anyone who has ever contributed a
> legally significant amount of code to Linux, then Linux will stay
> as GPLv2 only.
Then, you think that the "Balkanisation menace" is only smelly FUD,
Yes.
and that GPLv2 and v3 can cohesist without problems ???
Yes. GPLv2-only has co-existed with GPL incompatible licenses for a
long time, so why not here. The GPLv2-and-later can easily co-exist
without any problems too.
I'm not an expert, but we can have a GNU toolchain v3 and a Kernel
v2 ???
Sure, why not. The BSD folks had a GPL incompatible license, and used
GCC all within all known legal bounderies.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list