article on GPLv3, Linux kernel, and Devices Rigged to Malfunction
ciaran at fsfe.org
Tue Oct 24 12:36:19 UTC 2006
Alex Hudson <home at alexhudson.com> writes:
> I don't think anyone can sensibly argue
> that the requirement to publicise a shared secret code/key is not a term
> primarily concerned with post-violation compliance.
I'd say it's primarily concerned with pre-distribution decision making.
"Shall we tivoise? Oh, looks like we can't."
Ciarán O'Riordan __________________ \ http://fsfeurope.org/projects/gplv3
http://ciaran.compsoc.com/ _________ \ GPLv3 and other work supported by
http://fsfe.org/fellows/ciaran/weblog \ Fellowship: http://www.fsfe.org
More information about the Discussion