article on GPLv3, Linux kernel, and Devices Rigged to Malfunction

Ciaran O'Riordan ciaran at
Tue Oct 24 12:36:19 UTC 2006

Alex Hudson <home at> writes:
> I don't think anyone can sensibly argue
> that the requirement to publicise a shared secret code/key is not a term
> primarily concerned with post-violation compliance.

I'd say it's primarily concerned with pre-distribution decision making.

"Shall we tivoise?  Oh, looks like we can't."

CiarĂ¡n O'Riordan __________________ \ _________ \  GPLv3 and other work supported by \   Fellowship:

More information about the Discussion mailing list