Free Software Evangelism, revisited

Shane M. Coughlan shane at shaneland.co.uk
Sat May 27 16:18:26 UTC 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Ricardo Andere de Mello wrote:
> Of course that having money and doing what you like is a good thing, and
> that you can have both things, but Im again asking you, if you could
> only choose between a normal job with free software, and a more
> profitable job without free software, what would you choose?

I think this has drifted a long way from the point of the thread.  The
original point was about what constituted success in promoting something
like the idea of Free Software.  Tying that into vague and inherently
subjective views on 'good', 'bad' and 'worthy' is both confusing and
unhelpful.  I believe sticking to the point is important.

I stand by my original assertion that any unmeasurable advocacy is less
useful than measurable advocacy.  Whether the advocacy is geared towards
profit or not is a mute point.  That has nothing whatsoever to do with
Free Software as a concept.  Free Software is about Freedom for the user.

Shane

- --
Shane Martin Coughlan
e: shane at shaneland.co.uk
m: +447773180107
w: www.shaneland.co.uk
- ---
Projects:
http://mobility.opendawn.com	http://gem.opendawn.com
http://enigmail.mozdev.org	http://www.winpt.org
- ---
Organisations:
http://www.fsfeurope.org	http://www.fsf.org
http://www.labour.org.uk	http://www.opensourceacademy.gov.uk
- ---
OpenPGP: http://www.shaneland.co.uk/personalpages/shane/files/publickey.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4-svn4127: (MingW32)

iQCVAwUBRHh70twG3M95JPpzAQgBDgQAh3Hu8jGj1IH3RaJyxugOwvI546ESt5iE
swodnM4N8w1whfhbzV3wm2IG68uOrogHKeDXcUkv+It5x3HiHEp+V/A6SFd5dVM8
3YPbcPdi4R/cExtRCCtRqg0yq2r3Hs/Va9FiGqQ/BJn+TnVI7qfRcq7PaVFVfHsT
9gi907JXRMw=
=7wXV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the Discussion mailing list