the end; Re: The crux; ; Re: [yavor at doganov.org: Re: Defining Free Software Business]
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Wed Jun 28 10:31:52 UTC 2006
It only looks like a has-been when you talk about it. I have been
necessarily reminded by a few that you do not speak for the FSF.
It has been made quite clear several times that nobody here has spoken
for either FSF, FSF-e, or any other organisation or project. My
stance might coincide with whatever the FSF says, but it does not need
to. I find it quite amazing that people have such a hard problem
differentiating between `I think ...' and the `FSF thinks ...' and
getting a pet peeve of the domain from where an email came from while
ignoring the actual content of the message.
I thankyou for participating with me to this end so that I could
understand your position, I do not find it attractive but I admire
you for not abandoning what are obviously valuable principles.
We may talk again on other matters where we have some agreement.
Thank you for those kind works. I apologise for calling you a troll,
but I did find your last remark quite insulting, including a couple of
other remarks in your later messages which lead to the unfortunate
name calling.
Cheers.
More information about the Discussion
mailing list