[yavor at doganov.org: Re: Defining Free Software Business]
sam at liddicott.com
Tue Jun 27 19:24:28 UTC 2006
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> First, there is _no_ 100% replacement for Java. Go to
> http://packages.debian.org/, and ask it for a list of any package
> with 'Java' in the description located in the 'contrib' section.
> You forgot non-free. Which is part of Debian, and which Debian
> promotes usage of. There Sun Java is included. Can you explain how
> Debian advances free software by including a non-free version of Java?
> Look at the list of packages that Debian has freed from the Java
> trap. Are you _seriously_ telling me with all that, that Debian
> does not advance free software in this area?
> Yes. Finding packages that others have written is not advancing free
> software. Writting said software on the other hand is.
So I take it that the GBN will not be advancing free software either
then, (unless a free program is written to list GBN members).
It seems as if you sometimes constrain the meanings of your terms beyond
what your readers expect; I can't see any natural way of interpreting
Debians activity so that it cannot be said that they are advancing free
More information about the Discussion