Free Toaster (was: Defining Free Software Business)
Alfred M. Szmidt
ams at gnu.org
Tue Jun 27 16:30:54 UTC 2006
> All the four freedoms need to be usable for something to be
> useful. If you can't upload a new copy, then being able to
> modify it is pointless I think.
I disagree. It might be possible for the software (or at least
parts of it) to be used outside the original device.
Of course I would love the possibility to patch my toaster, but
that might cause additional costs on the hardware side that would
make the toaster not sell all too well.
I'm not sure if I interpret you correctly, but if your statement
somewhat implies that having access to the software of a device is
pointles if there is no possibility to upload modified versions, I
*strongly* disagree. Being able to inspect how something works is
*always* valuable, IMHO.
If you cannot excersise your freedoms due to a technical `restriction'
(e.g. ROM soldered to the PCB), then what is the point of having
partial freedom? You won't be able to excersie your rights to begin
But even if you do not have the source code in this case, you can
still examine and inspect how it works.
More information about the Discussion