Defining Free Software Business

[Sam Liddicott]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    debian does not hide this, unlike some other distributions.
>
> No, what Debian does is worse: it claims to be 100% free software when
> it is not.
>
>    One cannot observe most of FSF's actions.  Its funds could be
>    mainly used buying Lotus Notes for distributing Microsoft Word
>    macro games, for all most of us know.
>
> More absurd accusations without the the least of proof.
>
>   
Yes but in this case the accusation was intended to be absurd and the
burden of proof was on FSF; debian having met their burden of proof.

Interestingly what you have done is to delete this explanatory proof and
repeat your assertion as if the answer had never been given.

No doubt others can draw their conclusions with as little difficulty as
myself.

Sam